Before people ever discovered that something like trackbacks might be valuable for SEO purposes, there was the original purpose.Understanding why trackbacks were created in the first place will help in the ongoing web-wide discussion about follow vs. no-follow and the debate over whether a link is worth getting if Google doesn’t give you any credit for it.
What Are Trackbacks and Why Do They Exist?
Trackbacks were created by blog software programmers to help bloggers easily link to each other and get credit for doing so with automation. Rather than writing about someone else’s blog post on your site and then writing to them to let them know you just linked to their post and asking for the possibility of them linking back to you, trackbacks automate the process.
Don’t know what a trackback is? Check out my video on how to do a trackback. And see TrackBoost.
Before people realized that trackbacks could be used for SEO, bloggers used them for the direct traffic trackback links would send them from the blogs they comment on. Not in the comments area on that blogger’s site, but remotely.
Trackbacks are sort of like “remote comments” in that, the blog you are linking to gets notified automatically that you’ve linked to a particular post and the blogger gets the same email they would had you commented directly on their blog that a comment is awaiting moderation.
They check it out and see that you’ve done a trackback.
They come to your post through the link and see that you’ve been flattering them by linking directly to their latest post in your post and explaining why you liked their post.
They go back to their moderation area and approve your trackback and it shows up in the comments area with all the other comments on that particular post you linked to.
Other readers get into the discussion on that blog, see your trackback and click the link to see what you had to say about this post. Not all, but some will do this.
That was, and still should be, the #1 reason to do a trackback above all else.
I have said thousands of times in hundreds of trainings, all my reports and books on the subject of linking, and on this blog that links are for TRAFFIC first and that any SEO benefit you might get from them is a supplemental bonus to a well rounded linking campaign. NOT the entire goal of one.
If you visit someone’s blog and they seem overly concerned about doing trackbacks only on blogs that have no-follow turned off, take that as a hint that they might not know much of what they are talking about, or at least, they have an unnatural obsession with search engines that makes their marketing campaign unhealthy and less productive for their business.
People who only look for links on sites with “follow” links are missing the point in spades. I mean they are really, seriously under a severe misconception about what linking is for.
I don’t pay any attention whatsoever to no follow and I don’t spend all day looking at peoples’ source code to detect it. It is a complete and utter waste of time to do so. This site and my traffic is proof of that.
I get links and give links based on content that will help my readers and from places where my target reader surfs. Period. End of story. Follow or no follow, it truly doesn’t matter.
The moment I stopped paying attention to every little thing Google does to rank sites, the better my site started ranking.
The things I pay attention to where SEO is concerned are simply:
1. Serving my visitors relevant, high quality content as much as possible. This makes my average pageviews go up and Google doesn’t like high bounce rates. They like to see long visits and multi-page visits to determine the value of your site to visitors.
2. I write sensible but optimized titles for my posts. If you want to score for a keyword, it had better be in the title of your post and early in the content of that post. Here you can get into serious debate over keyword density and all kinds of other things, but following this basic rule will get you far down the road before you have to worry about density. I don’t calculation density because I am writing for my readers. If the keyword gets used the “proper” amount of times it is only because it was necessary to tell the story.
3. Getting links. I get all kinds and from whatever places have resonant content to mine or surfers that are the perfect target for my content, products and services. Many are links that Google follows. Many are certainly not. I can’t be sure the exact number because I don’t care. I get links. Period. I get links because of the real or potential direct traffic they provide. Any search engine justice I get from any links I pick up is merely a symptom of a good marketing campaign. Not the entire focus.
Trackbacks Are For Traffic!
Don’t allow yourself to get caught up in the debate over follow vs. no follow. It serves no purpose but to sap your time and energy. If you land on a blog that clearly has good readership and traffic and you want to do a post pointing your visitors to a great post on that blog, but you find that the blogger uses no follow, DO IT ANYWAY!
Are you going to miss out on all the potential traffic that blogger can send you just because Google won’t give you credit for the link? I certainly hope not! But thousands of people are hung up on that fact and are missing the forest for the trees!
I see people doing trackbacks to bloggers with do follow but no traffic! They actually think that’s better than doing a trackback on a blog with no follow but a ton of readers.
Listen, Google ALSO pays attention to how popular a site is in real visitors. If you are linked from a site that is do follow that gets no traffic and never gets popular, how much is that going to be worth to you in pagerank and link juice anyway?
Forget the fact that everyone should have do follow. That cat is out of the bag and the people who chose to go the no follow route, as ridiculous as it is, have made a choice that you cannot change.
Just Get Links!
Get them from social sites (many of which Google doesn’t follow links from even if the site itself is do follow!). Get them from high, medium, and low traffic sites. Get them from anywhere and everywhere your target market surfs.
Stay away from bad neighborhoods. Check out who you are linking TO and where you are getting links FROM. Don’t be a link whore. Just be natural in the way you pick where you get link love and keep it relevant so that the traffic you get is targeted to your content and products.
Everything else works itself out just fine, trust me. This is how I do it and it’s obviously working out well for me.
Don't
Miss Out On Free Traffic!
Subscribe to the FTR RSS feed
or our
email list so you don't miss out on real, traffic driving tips from Jack
Humphrey! You cal also and Follow Me on Twitter! Thanks for visiting!
























{ 2 trackbacks }
{ 14 comments… read them below or add one }
Edward Lomax 05.31.08 at 9:47 am
Thanks for the post Jack. I’m getting ready this week to start my Publishing Schedule on my new ASC blog, and have been trying to wrap my head around Trackbacks.
By the way, thanks for Trackboost… I can’t wait to start using it this week!
Edward Lomax’s last blog post..Unfair Web Advantage Blog
Glenn Twiddle 06.01.08 at 1:06 am
I’m still getting my head around some terms and how all this works, but Jack, I love ya for trying to get it down to my ‘rookie’ level. I’m getting there, thanks !!
African safari holidays 06.01.08 at 1:50 am
You are right Jack of late i have been wasting lots of time on getting links for my African vacation site than giving my visitors a great experience. I’ve realized that if you concentrate on giving them a great experience then you automatically increase the potential of people linking to you because good content attracts links. I’ve seen it happen.
African safari holidays’s last blog post..Kenya Luxury Safaris
Joseph Ratliff 06.01.08 at 3:16 pm
Jack,
That actually cleared up a couple of things about track backs for me.
Thanks for the lesson (again).
Joseph Ratliff
Joseph Ratliff’s last blog post..thePlanet catches fire, Houston data center down
BlogMeTheMoney 06.01.08 at 8:08 pm
I like the video you put together.
And I agree, that a link is good whether or not it has Do or No Follow with it. After all it advertises your blog, yourself as an author, and acts as a source of relevant visitors to your blog. I dont mind commenting on blogger sites at all.
BlogMeTheMoney’s last blog post..Weekend Quick Picks: Edition 3
Web Success Diva 06.02.08 at 8:21 am
Yet, again, a great post! I agree completely with your comments on the value of links, regardless of whether they are Do or No Follow. This is an often confusing “myth” that floats around online
Maria Reyes-McDavis
Web Success Diva’s last blog post..You Don’t Know Jack About Video Search Marketing
Tool Belt 06.02.08 at 11:12 am
Ya the video is great, as a visual learner it helped me understand the process a lot more. Plus it entertains my add more then reading.
Steve Casteel 06.14.08 at 5:10 pm
Thanks for clarifying this subject Jack. As a new blogger it’s sometimes confusing to know what the real scoop is. As usual, you cut right to the heart of the matter and reinforced what’s really important. Thanks again.
Steve Casteel’s last blog post..Small Reports Can Equal BIG Profits!
PotPieGirl 07.01.08 at 8:18 pm
Jack -
What a GREAT post. Sadly, I’m a little slow getting to it. All work and no play makes PotPieGirl cranky
I think you touched on such a valuable point - WRITE FOR YOUR READERS! All this blogging stuff gets MUCH easier when you relax, focus on your message, and stop checking (and RE-checking) your stats.
Some of my very best readers have found me from a comment or a link on another blog…and then I find THEM from their comments on MY blog. That, to me, is the best ‘marketing’ you can have for your blog - simply joining the conversation and forgetting about link juice and SEO value.
I love this blog!
Jennifer
~PotPieGirl
PotPieGirl’s last blog post..Affiliate Links In Articles?
Tom 07.16.08 at 12:21 am
This is a great post. I have a pathetic little blog hosted on wordpress.com that has had almost all of its traffic from trackbacks. Actually one trackback. I linked to a post on an authority politics blog, and I mean a big-time one. I’ve seen the person on Fox News, MSNBC, etc.
Anyway, I looked at my traffic stats one day and I was getting hits from the trackback. I couldn’t believe it. I didn’t even think there would be a trackback. I never bothered to check if it was dofollow or nofollow, and I don’t really care. I’ll take the traffic!
Tom’s last blog post..Backlink Solutions Dead?
Greg 08.10.08 at 3:41 pm
Hey Jack,
loved the article. I’ve been having ongoing discussions with a friend on some of the SEO points you’ve mentioned here. I sent her a link to this article. Maybe it’ll help us get on the same page.
Thanks.
Greg’s last blog post..Wrath of the Lich King on Amazon
Marc Rasmussen 09.18.08 at 5:31 am
Thanks for the trackback explanation. I was unclear as wo that they were. I like what you wrote about here “The things I pay attention to where SEO is concerned are simply.” Good stuff.
Martin Malden 09.22.08 at 10:45 pm
Jack, hi,
As I’ve said in several of my posts: Write for people - not the search engines. People will buy from you (hopefully), the search engines won’t (definitely)..!
Would I be right in assuming that Utility Poster creates the same linking benefit that manual trackbacks do..?
Cheers,
Martin.
Martin Maldens last blog post..How To Set Up The All In One SEO Plugin
Digital Photography 11.29.08 at 8:08 am
Thanks for your info on trackbacks. I keep receiving trackbacks and never understood the concepts and how they work until reading your post. Thanks
Digital Photographys last blog post..How To Start A Wedding Photography Business